{"id":868,"date":"2007-10-15T13:20:58","date_gmt":"2007-10-15T13:20:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/la-presse-anarchiste.net\/index.php\/2007\/10\/15\/un-peu-de-doctrine-en-passant\/"},"modified":"2007-10-15T13:20:58","modified_gmt":"2007-10-15T13:20:58","slug":"un-peu-de-doctrine-en-passant","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/la-presse-anarchiste.net\/index.php\/2007\/10\/15\/un-peu-de-doctrine-en-passant\/","title":{"rendered":"Un peu de doctrine en passant\u2026"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"image_pdf\"<\/a>\"image_print\"<\/a><\/div>

Dans une contro\u00adverse que
\nBen\u00adja\u00admin R. Tucker ins\u00e9\u00adra dans Liber\u00adty<\/em>, il revint sur quelques
\nques\u00adtions de prin\u00adcipe de pre\u00admi\u00e8re impor\u00adtance. Tra\u00addui\u00adsons la
\npar\u00adtie essen\u00adtielle de cette controverse. <\/p>\n

\t\u00ab Je n\u2019admets
\nrien, com\u00admence par d\u00e9cla\u00adrer Tucker, sauf l\u2019exis\u00adtence de
\nl\u2019in\u00addi\u00advi\u00addu, comme condi\u00adtion de sa sou\u00adve\u00adrai\u00adne\u00adt\u00e9\u2026 S\u2019il est
\nvrai que l\u2019af\u00adfir\u00adma\u00adtion de la sou\u00adve\u00adrai\u00adne\u00adt\u00e9 indi\u00advi\u00adduelle pr\u00e9c\u00e8de
\nlogi\u00adque\u00adment<\/em> la pro\u00adtes\u00adta\u00adtion contre l\u2019au\u00adto\u00adri\u00adt\u00e9 en tant que
\ntelle, dans la pra\u00adtique elles sont ins\u00e9\u00adpa\u00adrables. Protester
\ncontre l\u2019empi\u00e8tement sur la sou\u00adve\u00adrai\u00adne\u00adt\u00e9 individuelle,
\nc\u2019est n\u00e9ces\u00adsai\u00adre\u00adment affir\u00admer la sou\u00adve\u00adrai\u00adne\u00adt\u00e9 de
\nl\u2019individu. <\/p>\n

\tL\u2019a\u00adnar\u00adchiste porte
\ntou\u00adjours sur lui sa boite de muni\u00adtions ; il ne peut pas
\ncom\u00adbattre sans elle. Sinon, il devient Archiste\u2026 Comme je l\u2019ai fait
\nremar\u00adquer un jour au cama\u00adrade Llyod, l\u2019A\u00adnar\u00adchie ne pr\u00e9sente
\npas d\u2019as\u00adpect qui soit affir\u00adma\u00adtif, au sens construc\u00adtif. Ni comme
\nAnar\u00adchistes, ni\u200a\u2014\u200ace qui est pra\u00adti\u00adque\u00adment la m\u00eame chose \u2014
\ncomme indi\u00advi\u00addus sou\u00adve\u00adrains, nous n\u2019a\u00advons \u00e0 accom\u00adplir aucune
\n\u0153uvre construc\u00adtive, quoique, en tant qu\u2019\u00eatres progressifs,
\nnotre besogne soit immense. Cepen\u00addant, si nous jouis\u00adsions de la
\nliber\u00adt\u00e9 abso\u00adlue, nous pour\u00adrions, si nous le choisissons,
\ndemeu\u00adrer par\u00adfai\u00adte\u00adment inac\u00adtifs : nous n\u2019en serions pas moins des
\nindi\u00advi\u00addus souverains\u2026 \u00bb <\/p>\n

\tPlus loin : \u00ab Il
\nest tr\u00e8s facile de dis\u00adcer\u00adner qui est Anar\u00adchiste ou qui ne
\nl\u2019est pas. Il s\u2019a\u00adgit d\u2019une ques\u00adtion pour le d\u00e9ter\u00admi\u00adner sur le
\nchamp. Croyez-vous \u00e0 une forme quel\u00adconque d\u2019im\u00adpo\u00adsi\u00adtion sur la
\nvolon\u00adt\u00e9 humaine par la force ? Si oui, vous n\u2019\u00eates
\npar Anar\u00adchiste ; si non, vous l\u2019\u00eates. Peut-on demander
\nquelque chose de plus \u00e9vident, de plus scientifique ? \u00bb<\/p>\n

\t\u00ab Anar\u00adchie ne
\nveut pas sim\u00adple\u00adment dire oppo\u00adsi\u00adtion \u00e0 l\u2019ar\u00adchos<\/i>, au chef
\npoli\u00adtique. Il signi\u00adfie oppo\u00adsi\u00adtion \u00e0 arch\u00e9<\/i>. Or,
\narch\u00e9<\/i>, en pre\u00admier lieu, veut dire commencement,
\nori\u00adgine. Ce mot a ensuite pris le sens de pre\u00admier prin\u00adcipe<\/i>,
\n\u00e9l\u00e9\u00adment<\/i>, puis de pre\u00admi\u00e8re place<\/i>,
\npou\u00advoir supr\u00eame<\/i>, sou\u00adve\u00adrai\u00adne\u00adt\u00e9<\/i>, domi\u00adna\u00adtion<\/i>,
\ncom\u00adman\u00adde\u00adment<\/i>, auto\u00adri\u00adt\u00e9 <\/i>; fina\u00adle\u00adment il a
\nvou\u00adlu dire : un \u00e9tat sou\u00adve\u00adrain<\/i>, un empire<\/i>,
\nun royaume<\/i>, une magis\u00adtra\u00adture<\/i> ; un office<\/i>
\ngou\u00adver\u00adne\u00admen\u00adtal<\/i>. \u00c9ty\u00admo\u00adlo\u00adgi\u00adque\u00adment, le mot anar\u00adchie peut
\nrev\u00ea\u00adtir plu\u00adsieurs signi\u00adfi\u00adca\u00adtions, par\u00admi les\u00adquelles, comme
\nl\u2019\u00e9\u00adcrit mon contra\u00addic\u00adteur, celle de sans prin\u00adcipe
\ndirec\u00adteur<\/i>, et je n\u2019ai jamais objec\u00adt\u00e9 \u00e0 cet emploi
\nde ce mot, m\u2019ef\u00adfor\u00ad\u00e7ant tou\u00adjours, au contraire, d\u2019interpr\u00e9ter
\nselon leur d\u00e9fi\u00adni\u00adtion, la pen\u00ads\u00e9e de ceux qui se servent
\ndu terme anar\u00adchie dans ce sens. Cepen\u00addant, le mot Anar\u00adchie, comme
\nvocable phi\u00adlo\u00adso\u00adphique, et le mot Anar\u00adchiste, comme appel\u00adla\u00adtion d\u2019une
\nsecte phi\u00adlo\u00adso\u00adphique, ont d\u2019a\u00adbord \u00e9t\u00e9 appropri\u00e9s
\nconnue signi\u00adfiant oppo\u00adsi\u00adtion \u00e0 la domi\u00adna\u00adtion, \u00e0
\nl\u2019au\u00adto\u00adri\u00adt\u00e9, et le demeurent, du droit du pre\u00admier occu\u00adpant, et
\nqui rend impropres et confus toutes autres accep\u00adtions de ces
\ntermes \u00bb. D\u2019o\u00f9 il res\u00adsort que, d\u00e9pas\u00adsant la
\nsph\u00e8re poli\u00adtique, le mot Anar\u00adchie, ne veut pas dire
\nn\u00e9ces\u00adsai\u00adre\u00adment sans prin\u00adcipe direc\u00adteur, alors que pris dans
\nson sens doc\u00adtri\u00adnal, il signi\u00adfie tou\u00adjours oppo\u00adsi\u00adtion \u00e0 :,
\nn\u00e9ga\u00adtion de :, absence de : domi\u00adna\u00adtion<\/i>,
\nauto\u00adri\u00adt\u00e9<\/i>. Par suite, comme l\u2019\u00e9\u00adcrit Tucker en
\nconcluant sa contro\u00adverse, le terme Anar\u00adchie contient compl\u00e8tement
\net scien\u00adti\u00adfi\u00adque\u00adment la pro\u00adtes\u00adta\u00adtion, la reven\u00addi\u00adca\u00adtion individualiste.<\/p>\n

Lucy Sterne. <\/p>\n

\n<\/p>

\u2014 O \u2014<\/h2>\n

\tVoi\u00adci le pro\u00adgramme que
\ndans L\u2019UNICO, p\u00e9rio\u00addique parais\u00adsant \u00e0 Pana\u00adma en 1912,
\npr\u00e9\u00adsen\u00adtait une cer\u00adtaine F\u00e9d\u00e9ration
\nindi\u00advi\u00addua\u00adliste anarchiste : <\/p>\n

\t\u00ab 1.
\nAbo\u00adli\u00adtion de tout tri\u00adbut, loyer, rente, d\u00eeme ou imp\u00f4t. \u2014
\n2. Sup\u00adpres\u00adsion de toute ins\u00adti\u00adtu\u00adtion : polici\u00e8re,
\nmili\u00adtaire, gr\u00e9\u00adgaire ou patro\u00adnale.\u200a\u2014\u200a3, Abo\u00adli\u00adtion de toute
\nd\u00e9mar\u00adca\u00adtion, borne, limite ou fron\u00adti\u00e8re.\u200a\u2014\u200a4.
\nAbo\u00adli\u00adtion de tous titres,\u200a\u2014\u200a5. Une seule langue uni\u00adver\u00adselle,\u200a\u2014\u200a6,
\n\u00c9du\u00adca\u00adtion g\u00e9n\u00e9\u00adrale pour tous,\u200a\u2014\u200a7, Existence
\nassu\u00adr\u00e9e \u00e0 tous les enfants. \u00e2g\u00e9s ou
\nimpo\u00adtents.\u200a\u2014\u200a8. Celui qui veut man\u00adger, qu\u2019il travaille. \u00bb<\/p>\n

\t\u00ab Tel est
\nnotre pro\u00adgramme, facile \u00e0 com\u00adprendre et de r\u00e9alisation
\npossible. <\/p>\n

\t\u00ab D\u00e9pouillons-nous
\ndes vices, des haines, des mis\u00e8res qui sont notre apa\u00adnage et
\nnous serons en \u00e9tat de vivre la vie de cha\u00adcun pour soi. \u00bb<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Dans une contro\u00adverse que Ben\u00adja\u00admin R. Tucker ins\u00e9\u00adra dans Liber\u00adty, il revint sur quelques ques\u00adtions de prin\u00adcipe de pre\u00admi\u00e8re impor\u00adtance. Tra\u00addui\u00adsons la par\u00adtie essen\u00adtielle de cette contro\u00adverse.  \u00ab Je n\u2019admets rien, com\u00admence par d\u00e9cla\u00adrer Tucker, sauf l\u2019exis\u00adtence de l\u2019in\u00addi\u00advi\u00addu, comme condi\u00adtion de sa sou\u00adve\u00adrai\u00adne\u00adt\u00e9\u2026 S\u2019il est vrai que l\u2019af\u00adfir\u00adma\u00adtion de la sou\u00adve\u00adrai\u00adne\u00adt\u00e9 indi\u00advi\u00adduelle pr\u00e9\u00adc\u00e8de logi\u00adque\u00adment la pro\u00adtes\u00adta\u00adtion contre l\u2019au\u00adto\u00adri\u00adt\u00e9 en [\u2026]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"wp_typography_post_enhancements_disabled":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[99],"tags":[],"ppma_author":[540],"class_list":["post-868","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-lunique-n7-janvier-fevrier-1946"],"authors":[{"term_id":540,"user_id":1,"is_guest":0,"slug":"admin_3gikpwyf","display_name":"Vincent Dubuc","avatar_url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d015720652c25fd2ced191ade86430094e1f288a17483713e3b34d26dea52507?s=96&d=mm&r=g","author_category":"","user_url":"https:\/\/la-presse-anarchiste.net","last_name":"Dubuc","first_name":"Vincent","job_title":"","description":""}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/la-presse-anarchiste.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/868","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/la-presse-anarchiste.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/la-presse-anarchiste.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/la-presse-anarchiste.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/la-presse-anarchiste.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=868"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/la-presse-anarchiste.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/868\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/la-presse-anarchiste.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=868"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/la-presse-anarchiste.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=868"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/la-presse-anarchiste.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=868"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/la-presse-anarchiste.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ppma_author?post=868"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}